Bibliographic record
Abstract
INCOME AND EXPENDITURE 2007 Income from membership for this year was less than anticipated. Unfortunately one or two branches were behind with payment. Another 10,000 [euro] will be received, we expect, in 2008. We invite all branches to be punctual with sending their dues in the future, especially as Fontes is back on schedule and invoices from the publisher are arriving regularly. Almost all individual members paid their dues for 2007. Miscellaneous income from label sales and especially advertising was less than expected, but we may expect more income in the future thank to the efforts of David Day, our new advertising manager. We were able to sell our last offshore investments before the financial crisis and managed to make a small profit, unfortunately in US dollars, and the dollar has been weak in recent times. The US dollar account was closed late in 2007, by the bank, which no longer wishes to handle that sort of account. We will spend 2008 establishing whether we need a dollar account, or if we can accommodate dollar transactions, and their associated costs, from the Euro account. Expenditure was a bit less than expected. The Outreach Fund attracted a large donation from the Australian Branch, who requested that a large part of this should be transferred to the Naples Conference. 2007 was the 10th year in which 2.5% of all income (minus Outreach donation) was donated to the Outreach Fund. Membership dues bring in the bulk of the association's running costs, and membership has declined in recent years. We are currently targetting membership in South America; I do not think, however, that we can assume membership numbers to rise significantly, despite the best efforts of Jon Bagues, and this is the basis for the budget predictions for 2010, which have assumed that the membership numbers remain the same as 2008. We have to set the dues for 2010, and I have tried to adhere to the idea of a 2% increase; however, as I prefer to work in whole numbers, I propose that the institutional dues rise to i60 (from i59), and individuals rise to i36 (from i35.50). The dues I have proposed will result in an overall increase in this part of our income of just less than 2%. We are grateful to the 2007 auditors, Joost van Gemert and Jantien Dubbeldam. Kathy Adamson, treasurer; Martie Severt, past-treasurer June, 2008 ACCOUNTS 2007 A. RECEIPTS UK[pounds [euro] US$ sterling] 1) NATIONAL BRANCHES Australia 1794.60 Austria 1151.00 Canada 2657.60 Croatia 364.80 Czech Rep. 583.92 Denmark 2576.00 Estonia 702.60 Finland 2606.00 France 3224.00 Germany 8528.00 Hungary 456.00 Italy 6710.40 Japan 3542.00 Netherlands 3445.60 New Zealand 598.00 Norway 3106.40 Slovakia 352.00 Spain (2006) 3591.20 Sweden 3846.40 Switzerland 1832.00 United Kingdom 3294.40 & Ireland USA 7007.80 SUBTOTAL 61970.12 2) INDIVIDUAL 7382.00 998.88 MEMBERS (incl. sales of FAM back issues) 3) OUTREACH 5485.84 42.50 4) MISCELLANEOUS 367.20 543.00 430.90 (label sales and advertising) 5) INTEREST 522.31 1931.09 TOTAL 75727.47 3472.97 473.40 B. EXPENDITURE 1) FONTES ARTIS MUSICAE Production and 47400.05 20304.62 postal costs Editor Honorarium 2750.00 Office expenses 405.75 15.96 2) SECRETARY GENERAL Honorarium 2000. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".