MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531041451 · doi:10.7202/1012490ar

Faire entendre sa voix. L’adolescent en crise et le roman québécois récent

2012· article· fr· W1531041451 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel Letendre

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis les années 1960, la littérature québécoise tente de se mettre au monde dans un perpétuel recommencement du geste fondateur. Ce rapport ambigu avec l’héritage, l’histoire et la mémoire se manifeste dans le roman des années 2000 par l’entremise du personnage de l’adolescent en crise qui tente de détourner le legs transmis par le père. Par l’analyse des personnages d’adolescents en lutte contre leur père écrivain, notamment dans les derniers romans de Marie-Claire Blais et dans La bête du lac de Martin Thibault, cet article décrit, dans un premier temps, les héritages contre lesquels se braquent les adolescents, les stratégies que ces personnages adoptent pour détourner le legs paternel et leur efficacité. Dans un deuxième temps, il soumet l’hypothèse selon laquelle cette crise d’adolescence, qui se caractérise par un détournement de l’héritage de la parole et du silence du père, serait peut-être aussi celle de la littérature québécoise d’aujourd’hui, qui désire prendre ses distances par rapport à l’héritage imposant des figures tutélaires des lettres d’ici.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207