MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531057460

Risk-based least-cost strategy for managing risk associated with porcelain cutout asset in BC hydro system

2004· article· en· W1531057460 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Li, Gouri Bhuyan, Dexter Tarampi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringRisk assessmentOverhead (engineering)EngineeringAsset (computer security)Risk managementRisk analysis (engineering)Falling (accident)Forensic engineeringComputer scienceBusinessComputer securityElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Failure of porcelain cutouts has occasionally occurred in the BC Hydro distribution overhead system, which often resulted in cutouts falling apart or a live conductor swinging. This situation is very hazardous to both BC Hydro crews and the public. The failures were usually attributed to cracked cutouts subjected to internal or external loading from a combination of the manufacturing process and the electrical, mechanical and environmental operating conditions. To mitigate the risk, a risk assessment model was developed and used to manage BC Hydro porcelain cutouts, which includes condition assessment through random sampling, reliability testing and analysis, risk and cost-benefit analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power SystemsSame topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207