MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531057460

Risk-based least-cost strategy for managing risk associated with porcelain cutout asset in BC hydro system

2004· article· en· W1531057460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringRisk assessmentOverhead (engineering)EngineeringAsset (computer security)Risk managementRisk analysis (engineering)Falling (accident)Forensic engineeringComputer scienceBusinessComputer securityElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Failure of porcelain cutouts has occasionally occurred in the BC Hydro distribution overhead system, which often resulted in cutouts falling apart or a live conductor swinging. This situation is very hazardous to both BC Hydro crews and the public. The failures were usually attributed to cracked cutouts subjected to internal or external loading from a combination of the manufacturing process and the electrical, mechanical and environmental operating conditions. To mitigate the risk, a risk assessment model was developed and used to manage BC Hydro porcelain cutouts, which includes condition assessment through random sampling, reliability testing and analysis, risk and cost-benefit analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it