Charactéristiques d'une population introduit du Grand brochet, <em>Esox lucius</em>, dans le lac Ramsay, Parc de la Gatineau, Québec, et impact sur l'ichtyofaune
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 1995, la présence du Grand brochet (Esox lucius), une espèce piscivore, a été notée pour la première fois dans le lac Ramsay, Parc de la Gatineau (Québec). Il a été déterminé que l’espèce a été introduite après l’été 1991. Un échantillonnage exhaustif de l’ichtyofaune du lac en 2001 et 2002 a permis de constater que trois des 17 petites espèces de poissons du lac sont probablement disparues: le Mulet perlé (Margariscus margarita), l’Épinoche à cinq épines (Culaea inconstans) et une forme rare de l’Épinoche à trois épines (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Il est prédit que plusieurs autres espèces pourraient disparaître au cours des prochaines années. La croissance du Grand brochet dans le lac Ramsay est comparable aux autres lacs du sud du Québec. En 2001, le rapport femelles:mâles était de 15 : 1, une valeur anormale et inexpliquée.In 1995, the Northern Pike (Esox lucius), a piscivorous fish, was captured for the first time in Ramsay Lake, a small lake of the Gatineau Park (Québec). It was determined that this species was introduced after the summer of 1991. An exhaustive survey of the ichthyofauna of this lake in 2001 and 2002 indicated that three of the 17 small-bodied species of the lake have probably disappeared: the Pearl Dace (Margariscus margarita), the Fivespine Stickleback (Culaea inconstans) and a special form of the Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). It is predicted that several other species may be extirpated in the next few years. Northern Pike growth in the lake is comparable to other values obtained for other southern Québec lakes. In 2001, the female:male ratio was highly unbalanced and difficult to explain at 15 : 1. Erratum added.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".