MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531232122 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.89.015502

Improved measurement of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mi>β</mml:mi><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>half-life of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>136</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Xe with the EXO-200 detector

2014· article· lv· W1531232122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on an improved measurement of the $2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ half-life of ${}^{136}$Xe performed by EXO-200. The use of a large and homogeneous time-projection chamber allows for the precise estimate of the fiducial mass used for the measurement, resulting in a small systematic uncertainty. We also discuss in detail the data-analysis methods used for double-$\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay searches with EXO-200, while emphasizing those directly related to the present measurement. The ${}^{136}$Xe $2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ half-life is found to be ${T}_{1/2}^{2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}}$ = $2.165\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.016(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.059(\mathrm{sys})\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{21}$ yr. This is the most precisely measured half-life of any $2\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\beta}$ decay to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it