MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531246710 · doi:10.25071/1923-9408.25533

Not About Love

2004· article· en· W1531246710 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTessera · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSimone de Beauvoir and Sartre
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About Love Amelia Walker Est-if possible d'eprouver une attirance purement physique pour l'esprit d'une personne?Le sexe peut-if etre totalement denue d'amour?Qu 'estce que l'amour, de toute far;on?Peu importe.Ce n 'est pas une histoire d'amour.Vraiment pas."Another drink?" asks Sal.We're sitting in the Jade Monkey, drinking cheap wine and listening to noise.The place reminds me of a David Lynch film ... or a film by students copying his style.It's simultaneously pretentious and kitsch, but at least we're not likely to see anyone we know."Yes thanks."Sal heads off.I feel people staring at me.They've been doing it all night, so blatant I can hear them thinking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it