MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531308045 · doi:10.3968/4630

A Class of Non-Symmetric Semi-Classical Linear Forms

2014· article· en· W1531308045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Zaatra

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in applied mathematics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsClass (philosophy)Sequence (biology)CombinatoricsPure mathematicsSet (abstract data type)Recurrence relationRelation (database)Discrete mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We  show that  if v is a regular semi-classical  form  (linear functional), then the form u defined by ( x − τ 2 ) σu = −λv and σ ( x − τ ) u = 0 where σu is the even part of u , is also regular and semi-classical form for every complex λ except for a discrete set of numbers depending on v . We give explicitly the recurrence coefficients and the structure relation coefficients of the orthogonal polynomials sequence associated with u and the class of the  form u knowing that of v . We conclude with illustrative examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in applied mathematicsSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207