Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este articulo analizo como , entendiendo la memoria como conservacion y el olvido como supresion ( Todorov )y es posible interpretar la produccion revisionista del franquismo en la Espana del siglo XXI desde lo que he dado en llamar olvido presencial y presencia del olvido Revisando la figura de Franco y el franquismo en algunas obras literarias y sus correspondientes versiones filmicas, analisis historicos y gags televisivos, exploro la idea de que todas ellas son aproximaciones discursivas (White): una pretendida vision intermedia y reconciliadora (Soldados de Salamina), una vision desde la izquierda (La voz dormida) y una vision desde la derecha (entrada de Franco en el Diccionario Biografico Espanol). Argumento que a todas esas perspectivas se contrapone la aproximacion a la figura de Franco que hace el programa de humor Polonia, de la television autonomica catalana. Con ello expongo que mediante el humor , y concretamente la satira politica , es factible una salida saludable a la revision del franquismo , puesto que el equipo artistico de Polonia auna el Franco vilipendiado por la izquierda y el Franco adulado por la derecha (Preston), sin pretension dogmatizante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".