MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular cloning, bacterial expression and properties of Rab31and Rab32

2002· article· en· W1531441050 on OpenAlexaff
Xiankun Bao, Andrea E. Faris, Elliott K. Jang, Richard J. Haslam

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Biochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRabG proteinMolecular biologyBiologyComplementary DNAGenBankPeptide sequenceGTP'BiochemistryBlotBinding proteinGeneGTPaseSignal transductionEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GTP-binding proteins of the Rab family were cloned from human platelets using RT-PCR. Clones corresponding to two novel Rab proteins, Rab31 and Rab32, and to Rab11A, which had not been detected in platelets previously, were isolated. The coding sequence of Rab31 (GenBank accession no. U59877) corresponded to a 194 amino-acid protein of 21.6 kDa. The Rab32 sequence was extended to 1000 nucleotides including 630 nucleotides of coding sequence (GenBank accession no. U59878) but the 5' coding sequence was only completed later by others (GenBank accession no. U71127). Human Rab32 cDNA encodes a 225 amino-acid protein of 25.0 kDa with the unusual GTP-binding sequence DIAGQE in place of DTAGQE. Northern blots for Rab31 and Rab32 identified 4.4 kb and 1.35 kb mRNA species, respectively, in some human tissues and in human erythroleukemia (HEL) cells. Rabbit polyclonal anti-peptide antibodies to Rab31, Rab32 and Rab11A detected platelet proteins of 22 kDa, 28 kDa and 26 kDa, respectively. Human platelets were highly enriched in Rab11A (0.85 microg x mg of platelet protein(-1)) and contained substantial amounts of Rab32 (0.11 microg x mg protein(-1)). Little Rab31 was present (0.005 microg x mg protein(-1)). All three Rab proteins were found in both granule and membrane fractions from platelets. In rat platelets, the 28-kDa Rab32 was replaced by a 52-kDa immunoreactive protein. Rab31 and Rab32, expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST)-fusion proteins, did not bind [alpha-(32)P]GTP on nitrocellulose blots but did bind [(35)S]GTP[S] in a Mg(2+)-dependent manner. Binding of [(35)S]GTP[S] was optimal with 5 microm Mg(2+)(free) and was markedly inhibited by higher Mg(2+) concentrations in the case of GST-Rab31 but not GST-Rab32. Both proteins displayed low steady-state GTPase activities, which were not inhibited by mutations (Rab31(Q64L) and Rab32(Q85L)) that abolish the GTPase activities of most low-M(r) GTP-binding proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of BiochemistrySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207