MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531553675 · doi:10.1002/9781118995433.ch16

Synthesis of Diamond and Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Double‐Layered Nanostructures by Hot Filament Chemical Vapor Deposition

2014· other· en· W1531553675 on OpenAlexafffund
Lizhong Yang, Ch Sateesh Kumar, Q. Yang, Y. S. Li, C. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCeramic transactions /Ceramic transactions · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemical vapor depositionCarbon nanotubeDiamondMaterials scienceNanotechnologyNanostructureNanotubeProtein filamentCarbon nanotube quantum dotCarbon fibersDeposition (geology)Chemical engineeringComposite materialComposite numberGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCeramic transactions /Ceramic transactionsSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207