MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531727587 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n11p1

Students’ Views on the Use of a Virtual Educational Museum

2015· article· en· W1531727587 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kampouropoulou Maria, Persa Fokiali, Ioanna Efstathiou, Theodoros Koutris, Efstathios Stefos

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionPromotion (chess)SociologyPedagogyFormal educationCultural heritageMathematics educationPsychologyPolitical scienceGeographyVisual artsArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Culture and Education are two concepts intertwined together as, through Education, formal and informal, forms and elements of Culture are developed. Education is therefore one of the most important factors of enhancement, promotion and preservation of cultural heritage through the development of appropriate educational “spaces” directed to different social groups. The research took place in Greece over the Academic year 2013-14 and it was carried out nationally aiming students’ depiction of views and attitudes on the use of a virtual educational Museum. The total number of respondents nationwide was 22902 students of first, second and third grade of High School.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.474
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicMuseums and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207