MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531904492 · doi:10.1300/j046v15n03_03

Demographics and Subjective Response

2003· article· en· W1531904492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nader Asgary, Alf H. Walle, Jennifer A. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Consumer Marketing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographicsTourismHumanismOrder (exchange)MarketingPsychologyAdvertisingSocial psychologyGeographySociologyBusinessPolitical scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper uses demographic variables in order to analyze the subjective responses of consumers. In specific, subjective consumer evaluations regarding a tourism destination are analyzed. In doing so, the concerns of the contemporary humanistic research stream of modern consumer research are combined with more traditional quantitative research techniques. Using this hybrid model, the paper demonstrates that the United States' and the Canadian sides of Niagara Falls are distinctive and that each attracts visitors who possess a different demographic profile. The United States' side is more attractive to upscale tourists with higher levels of education, and is a more family-oriented region than the Canadian side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Consumer MarketingSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207