MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532002333

Familiar Patterns: Hmong and Mennonite Quiltmakers in Lancaster County

2006· article· en· W1532002333 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Heather Gibson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mennonite studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuiltQuiltingStyle (visual arts)GirlArtVisual artsArt historyHistoryGenealogyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quilt pictured in Figure 1 is decorated with a graceful flower bouquet applique within a circular medallion, surrounded by geometric piecing in graduating shades of teal and rose, and finished with parallel lines of quilting. This is the type of country style quilt you might find at a shop in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. It would be displayed among a colorful array of handmade quilts, and would probably be promoted as “Locally Made” or simply “Amish.” In this case, however, the quilt is decorating the bed of the local quiltmaker, a Hmong woman from Laos who made it. The flowers, bows and birds she sews onto country quilts are not part of the repertoire of designs she learned as a girl, but these motifs have become a significant part of her life in the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mennonite studiesSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207