MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532011279 · doi:10.1080/14616742.2014.941252

“Cripping” the World Bank

2014· article· en· W1532011279 on OpenAlexaff
Corinne L. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Feminist Journal of Politics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersWorld Bank Group
KeywordsTechnocracyEmpowermentFlexibility (engineering)Promotion (chess)Order (exchange)EconomicsPolitical scienceSociologyEconomic growthFinancePoliticsManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a mathematical measurement called “disability-adjusted life years” (DALYs), the World Bank claims that violence against women is costly. In order to wrestle with representative grammars associated with this technocratic measurement, this article uses crip theory to investigate how the World Bank conceptualizes violence against women as requiring individual adjustments, resiliency and flexibility rather than structural and systemic change. It suggests the DALY measurement fits squarely within World Bank neoliberal economic schemas, especially the promotion of women's labor engagements as empowerment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Feminist Journal of PoliticsSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207