MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532096202 · doi:10.1002/9781118280874.ch6

The Global Iron Cycle

2012· other· en· W1532096202 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Kendall, Ariel D. Anbar, Andreas Kappler, Kurt O. Konhauser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It should come as no surprise that iron, the fourth most abundant element in the Earth’s crust (Taylor and McLennan, 1985), is essential in biology. Yet, in today’s oceans, iron is a vanishingly rare element (Fig. 6.1). Its concentration – typically <1 nM (Johnson et al., 1997; Boye et al., 2001; Cullen et al., 2006) – is so low that iron scarcity limits biological productivity across large areas of the Earth’s surface (Martin and Fitzwater, 1988). This peculiar situation is a consequence of the chemical behaviour of iron on an oxygenated Earth. In the pres-ence of abundant O2, the element is found primarily in the Fe(III) oxidation state, which forms poorly soluble oxyhydroxides. Why, then, is iron required by biology? Most likely, this is a legacy of early evolution when iron was ubiquitous on land and in the sea. It also helped

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1840.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207