Bibliographic record
Abstract
A l’inverse des femmes, les ingénieurs masculins connaissent une réussite professionnelle d’autant plus remarquable qu’ils ont une descendance nombreuse. A partir d’un examen de la littérature portant sur les hommes et sur les ingénieurs la discussion est menée sur les principales hypothèses que suggère ce constat. Ces pères à qui sourit la fortune professionnelle sont-ils des Breadwinners au sens parsonien, soutenus dans leur carrière par une épouse bien dotée et dont la responsabilité d’enfants à nourrir stimule un zèle au travail apprécié par les employeurs, ou des ingénieurs plus conformes que les autres aux représentations dominantes de la virilité ? Au terme de l’analyse, appuyée sur diverses enquêtes statistiques sur les ingénieurs diplômés et cadres, il est difficile de trancher entre ces diverses figures, tout comme sur celle, plus étonnante, des ingénieurs célibataires et sans enfant, aux carrières nettement moins brillantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".