MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532305341 · doi:10.3138/tric.26.1.142

The Development of Professional Theatre in St. John’s 1967 - 1982: A Personal Perspective

2005· article· fr· W1532305341 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
D. K. Ferry

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Personal developmentPersonal accountSociologyProfessional developmentPsychologyEngineering ethicsVisual artsPedagogyArtEngineeringLiteraturePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans une communication intitulée « Some Observations on the Evolution of Professional Theatre in St. John’s: 1967-1992 », le comédien, metteur en scène et dramaturge terre-neuvien David Ferry offrait aux participants de la conférence « Shifting Tides » un point de vue original, engageant et personnel sur le développement du théâtre professionnel dans sa ville natale de St. John’s. Provocatrice et animée, sa présentation a su froisser quelques personnes tout en soulignant des différences culturelles et commerciales fondamentales qui existent entre sa province natale et le reste du Canada. S’inspirant de ses propres expériences, basés sur des données recueillies dans les archives et dans des ouvrages et surtout, sur des témoignages de gens associés de près au développement théâtral et social à Terre-Neuve, les propos de Ferry reflètent à la fois l’importance capitale de l’histoire orale et ses turbulences souvent contradictoires. Cette édition du Forum est consacrée à plusieurs extraits de la contribution par Ferry à la conférence de 2004, extraits qui sont légèrement marqués par la rétrospection (et l’influence éditoriale). Ferry continue de retravailler son texte afin d’en faire une étude savante à plus grande portée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207