Análisis en clave competencial del Proyecto de ley estatal sobre transparencia, acceso a la información pública y buen gobierno
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on the analysis of the several competencies that serve the Central Government and the regional governments to pass laws on transparency and access to public information: it specifically focuses on the regulation of the right of access to information. We aim to analyze, from the perspective of the distribution of powers, whether the Spanish bill on transparency, right of access to information and good governance fits within the Spanish pluri-legislative framework. Some regions have already passed their owntransparency laws and have regulated, even minimally, the right of access to public information or, otherwise, to the administrative files and records. Additionally, we offer a brief panorama of how the regulation of the right of access has been articulated in other politically decentralized states, such as the USA, Canada, Switzerland and Italy. This will allow us to reach some conclusions on whether having a single legal framework guaranteeing the right of access is a must.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it