Subcortical gray matter segmentation and voxel‐based analysis using transverse relaxation and quantitative susceptibility mapping with application to multiple sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate subcortical gray matter segmentation using transverse relaxation rate (R2 *) and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and apply it to voxel-based analysis in multiple sclerosis (MS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Voxel-based variation in R2 * and QSM within deep gray matter was examined and compared to standard whole-structure analysis using 37 MS subjects and 37 matched controls. Deep gray matter nuclei (caudate, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus) were automatically segmented and morphed onto a custom atlas based on QSM and standard T1 -weighted images. Segmentation accuracy and scan-rescan reliability were tested. RESULTS: When considering only significant regions as returned by the multivariate voxel-based analysis, increased R2 * and QSM was found in MS subjects compared to controls in portions of all four nuclei studied (P < 0.002). For R2 *, regional analysis yielded at least 66-fold improved P-value significance in all nuclei over standard whole-structure analysis, while for QSM only thalamus benefited, with 5-fold improvement in significance. Improved segmentation over standard methods, particularly for globus pallidus (2.8 times higher Dice score), was achieved by incorporating high-contrast QSM into the atlas. Voxel-based reliability was highest for QSM (<1% variation). CONCLUSION: Automatic segmentation of iron-rich deep gray matter can be improved by incorporating QSM. Voxel-based evaluation yielded increased R2 * and QSM in MS subjects in all four nuclei studied with R2 *, benefiting the most from localized analysis over whole-structure measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".