MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532522712

Novela histórica y responsabilidad social del escritor: El camino trazado por Benjamín Prado en Mala gente que camina

2005· article· en· W1532522712 on OpenAlexaff
Ignacio Soldevila Durante, Javier Lluch Prats

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Culture and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonyDictatorshipSubject (documents)Period (music)Spanish Civil WarHumanitiesExtension (predicate logic)HistorySociologyPolitical scienceArtLawAestheticsPoliticsLibrary science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde el final de la dictadura franquista muy notable es el número de novelas cuya temática ha seguido circunscribiéndose a la Guerra Civil y sus consecuencias. La continuidad del tema -que arranca en pleno conflicto- no sólo obedece a que aún vivan muchos de quienes padecieron los años de la posguerra, sino también a que es un tema axial de nuestro devenir y, por extensión, del siglo XX. En nuestra literatura, ocuparse de la guerra continúa siendo más compromiso que evasión y, sobre todo, es sentido de la responsabilidad de los escritores hacia nuestra sociedad. En el caso de la novela histórica, ésta ha recuperado pasajes ausentes en el discurso historiográfico hegemónico que nos ha sido transmitido, como demuestra, a modo de paradigma, una excelente novela de la que nos ocupamos aquí: Mala gente que camina (2006), de Benjamín Prado, que aborda y desvela, entre otros, el asunto de los niños rojos robados por el franquismo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicSpanish Culture and IdentityFrench-language works237,207