MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532522712

Novela histórica y responsabilidad social del escritor: El camino trazado por Benjamín Prado en Mala gente que camina

2005· article· en· W1532522712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Culture and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonyDictatorshipSubject (documents)Period (music)Spanish Civil WarHumanitiesExtension (predicate logic)HistorySociologyPolitical scienceArtLawAestheticsPoliticsLibrary science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde el final de la dictadura franquista muy notable es el número de novelas cuya temática ha seguido circunscribiéndose a la Guerra Civil y sus consecuencias. La continuidad del tema -que arranca en pleno conflicto- no sólo obedece a que aún vivan muchos de quienes padecieron los años de la posguerra, sino también a que es un tema axial de nuestro devenir y, por extensión, del siglo XX. En nuestra literatura, ocuparse de la guerra continúa siendo más compromiso que evasión y, sobre todo, es sentido de la responsabilidad de los escritores hacia nuestra sociedad. En el caso de la novela histórica, ésta ha recuperado pasajes ausentes en el discurso historiográfico hegemónico que nos ha sido transmitido, como demuestra, a modo de paradigma, una excelente novela de la que nos ocupamos aquí: <i>Mala gente que camina</i> (2006), de Benjamín Prado, que aborda y desvela, entre otros, el asunto de los niños rojos robados por el franquismo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it