Effects of Force Enhancement and Force Depression on Postactivation Potentiation in the Human Adductor Pollicis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Force enhancement and force depression following active stretch and shortening are commonly observed muscle properties. However the mechanisms underlying these properties are not fully understood. Increased or decreased muscle potentiation (that is, the amount of phosphorylation of the myosin light chains) might contribute to force enhancement and force depression but has never been examined. In this study, we examined the effect of active stretch and shortening on potentiation of the in vivo human adductor pollicis muscle to determine whether the phosphorylation that causes muscle potentiation is a viable contributor to force enhancement and depression. Potentiation was assessed with twitch contractions and the contribution of potentiation to force enhancement/depression was assessed by comparing the force of isometric contractions prior to and following muscle potentiation. Subjects were given twitches before and after maximum voluntary isometric contractions at a thumb adduction angle of 30° and 0°, and these twitches were compared to twitches given before and after an active stretch from 0° to 30° (n=15) and an active shortening (n=12) from 30° to 0°. Stretch and shortening contractions were then followed 10s later by an isometric contraction at the finishing position to observe any effects of changed potentiation on maximal voluntary isometric contractions. Potentiation was increased significantly (17%) after active muscle stretching but remained unchanged following active muscle shortening. The increased potentiation following active muscle stretching did not affect isometric forces. We conclude from these results that active muscle stretching increases the amount of muscle potentiation, but does not contribute to the force enhancement observed following active muscle stretch. We speculate that the stretch-induced increase in muscle potentiation is a mechanism for saving energy during sub- maximal and maximal muscular contractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".