Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous proposons d'aborder dans cet article le concept d'espace public dans un contexte domine par le double processus d'industrialisation et de marchandisation de la culture. Dans un premier temps, nous commencerons par revenir sur la facon dont Jurgen Habermas a envisage le developpement de la presse en tant qu'element constitutif de l'espace public. En nous interessant plus particulierement a la facon dont la presse a ete recuperee par la sphere marchande, nous verrons combien cette analyse de Jurgen Habermas est utile a la comprehension de la transformation actuelle de l'espace public. C'est dans le meme esprit que nous presenterons ensuite les travaux plus recents d'Yves de la Haye et de Bernard Miege qui developpent le concept de relations publiques generalisees qui nous semble pertinente pour caracteriser l'evolution de l'espace public depuis ces vingt dernieres annees. Enfin, nous verrons justement en quoi ces deux concepts sont susceptibles d'eclairer quelques travaux effectues depuis une dizaine d'annees sur le role des journalistes dans des societes pretendument democratiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.025 | 0.025 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".