The role of helix 8 and of the cytosolic C‐termini in the internalization and signal transduction of B<sub>1</sub> and B<sub>2</sub> bradykinin receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determinants for desensitization and sequestration of G protein-coupled receptors often contain serine or threonine residues located in their C-termini. The sequence context, however, in which these residues have to appear, and the receptor specificity of these motifs are largely unknown. Mutagenesis studies with the B(2) bradykinin receptor (B(2)wt), stably expressed in HEK 293 cells, identified a sequence distal to N338 (NSMGTLRTSI, including I347 but not the basally phosphorylated S348) and in particular the TSI sequence therein, as a major determinant for rapid agonist-inducible internalization and the prevention of receptor hypersensitivity. Chimeras of the noninternalizing B(1) bradykinin receptor (B(1)wt) containing these B(2)wt sequences sequestered poorly, however, suggesting that additional motifs more proximal to N338 are required. In fact, further substitution of the B(1)wt C-terminus with corresponding B(2)wt regions either at C330(7.71) following putative helix 8 (B(1)CB(2)) or at the preceding Y312(7.53) in the NPXXY sequence (B(1)YB(2)) resulted in chimeras displaying rapid internalization. Intriguingly, however, exchange performed at K322(7.63) within putative helix 8 generated a slowly internalizing chimera (B(1)KB(2)). Detailed mutagenesis analysis generating additional chimeras identified the change of V323 in B(1)wt to serine (as in B(2)wt) as being responsible for this effect. The slowly internalizing chimera as well as a B(1)wt point-mutant V323S displayed significantly reduced inositol phosphate accumulation as compared to B(1)wt or the other chimeras. The slow internalization of B(1)KB(2) was also accompanied by a lack of agonist-induced phosphorylation, that in contrast was observed for B(1)YB(2) and B(1)CB(2), suggesting that putative helix 8 is either directly or indirectly (e.g. via G protein activation) involved in the interaction between the receptor and receptor kinases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".