MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W153266012

Creating space for indigenous knowledges: considerations for aboriginal cultural tourism education

2011· dissertation· en· W153266012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Pask

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSpace (punctuation)TourismSociologyAnthropologyMedia studiesGeographySocial sciencePedagogyLinguisticsArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In post-secondary environments within Canada and around the world, institutional shifts are changing the landscape to create space for indigenous knowledges.The changes are reflected not only in the physical environment, but are also seen in the intellectual landscape with the creation of new faculties, programs, and courses providing for indigenous research and discourse resulting in more comprehensive ways of knowing and understanding the world.This qualitative research study unfolds the story of the Aboriginal Youth Ambassador Cultural Interpreter training program in preparation for the opening of the Squamish Lil'wat Cultural Centre in Whistler, British Columbia.It focuses on instructional design and learning processes by weaving materials developed throughout the process with the perspectives of instructors, program managers, post-secondary administrators, and funders.Structured using the instructional systems design framework known best by the acronym ADDIE, each chapter contains a series of observations and recommendations designed to positively affect all aspects of indigenous cultural tourism education.The study suggests that: increased indigenous control of training and education funding, a provincially mandated requirement that post-secondary institutions demonstrate organizational readiness to serve indigenous communities, articulation of indigenous tourism programs and courses, and clear evaluative reporting indicators, significant changes can be made.These changes have the potential to enhance individual experiences, support community-based development activities, improve institutional effectiveness and promote innovative industry practices.The study concludes that creating space for indigenous knowledges will result in stronger, healthier academic environments further empowering students, faculty, and administrators; positively contributing to academia, local communities and strengthening the fabric of Canadian society.iv DEDICATION For the people in my life who through their guidance, friendship, wonderful meals, humour, warmth and love have helped me to recognize that the power to realize our dreams -to learn from the past and to know what is important for the future is within uswe just need to take the time to listen.To my parents, Suzanne and Graham Pask who instilled in me the belief that a life lived with integrity, dedication and hard work is one well-lived.I am grateful for your encouragement, support, and example.To Rachel and Nicholasthe long nights and early chatty mornings, the crazy dancing, tickle attacks, cuddling, bird watching, backyard soccer, science experiments and knock-knock jokeseverything you doeverything you areyou make it perfect.v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Osieum and K kwstum ckacw to the Skwxwú7mesh and Lil´wat7úl Chiefs, elders, cultural educators, students, and community members who have enabled me to embark on this journey to begin to understand the depth, strength, beauty, and vitality of your distinct cultures.It is with a great sense of humility and honour that I recognize the ability to receive these ideas and present the knowledge that has been shared by formal and informal knowledge keepers.The lessons that I have learned about the importance of love, respect and humour; the meaning of community, and the sense of peace that comes from knowing the physical and spiritual environment around us, and how these important rich deep systems are inextricably connected to culture, this is just a start of what has enriched my life in so many ways.I am forever changed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0360.024
Scholarly communication0.0240.009
Open science0.0040.014
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicTourism, Volunteerism, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207