MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532676567 · doi:10.1063/1.3041494

Pathways and reduced-dimension five-dimensional potential energy surface for the reactions H3++CO→H2+HCO+ and H3++CO→H2+HOC+

2008· article· en· W1532676567 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Li, Tsuneo Hirano, T. Amano, Robert J. Le Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)ChemistryPotential energy surfaceMathematicsMoleculeCombinatoricsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To obtain theoretical insight regarding the stability and formation dynamics of the interstellar ions HCO(+) and HOC(+), stationary points and the associated vibrational frequencies on the full nine-dimensional potential energy surface for the electronic ground state have been calculated using coupled-cluster theory with both single and double substitutions (CCSD). The energetics were refined with a higher-level coupled-cluster method CCSD(T), with core-valence electron correlation treated at the complete basis set limit. To elucidate the formation mechanism and internal relaxation processes, the reaction paths for the reactions H(3) (+)+CO-->H(2)+HCO(+) and H(3) (+)+CO-->H(2)+HOC(+) were calculated at the second-order Moller-Plesset (MP2) level, and corresponding single-point energies were obtained at the higher CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ level. Based on the analysis of the main reaction processes, a reduced-dimension five-dimensional potential energy surface for this system was constructed from 128 440 ab initio points calculated at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207