Comparison between CRLH zeroth-order antenna and series-fed microstrip patch array antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A metal-insulator-metal (MIM) composite right/left-handed (CRLH) series-mode zeroth-order resonant antenna (ZORA) optimized for the 24 GHz ISM band is presented and compared to a series-fed patch array (SFPA) antenna. The CRLH ZORA exhibits superior performances for relatively short lengths (≪ 3λ 0 ) whereas the SFPA may performs better, depending on the specific design, when the length is very long (≫ 5λ 0 ), so that the resonant antennas operate as leaky-wave antennas with a leakage factor proportional to the density of the radiators along the structure. To our knowledge it the first time that the leaky-wave operation of an electrically very large “resonator” has been explicitly identified. The ZORA is particularly recommended for average electrical sizes in the order of 2λ 0 , where it should be systematically superior to a SFPA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".