« Infiniment plus de choses dans la vie que dans la loi » : la reconnaissance des mères lesbiennes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte rappelle qu’une réforme des règles relatives à la filiation visant à faire une place à deux parents de même sexe ne pourrait simplement refléter les pratiques sociales ; au contraire, elle les influencerait aussi de différentes manières. En s’appuyant sur les recherches et les débats qui ont été principalement publiés en anglais, il compare les régimes mis en place au Royaume-Uni et au Québec afin de reconnaître la maternité des couples lesbiens dès la naissance d’un enfant né de la procréation assistée, sans passer par l’adoption. Ensuite, il compare les portraits de la maternité lesbienne qui s’en dégagent avec ceux qui nous sont fournis par la recherche empirique sociologique. Ces comparaisons donneront lieu à des réflexions quant aux problèmes méthodologiques que soulève la tentative de rapprocher le droit et les pratiques sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".