A Solution to the Inverse Problem of Coupled Hydrological and Thermal Regimes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In typical geological settings, the subsurface hydrological and thermal regimes are often closely coupled. A realistic analysis of the coupled systems requires that the two regimes be considered simultaneously. To make optimal use of the often noisy hydrological and thermal data, it is necessary to adopt an inverse formulation. In this paper, we report some results of our Erst stage investigation, using a steady state, 2—D (cross—section) model. A 2—D isoparametric finite element model is used to discretize the problem, and the nodal values of temperature and hydraulic head, as well as the elemental medium thermal conductivities and permeabilities, are treated as parameters. A generalized non—linear stochastic inverse method of Bayesian type is used for parameter estimation, with the a priori information on the parameters described in terms of the first two moments of the appropiate probability distributions. For computational efficiency, a gradient method is used in the parameter estimation procedure, and the gradient matrix (derivatives of the parameterized system with respect to the parameters), needed in the iteration scheme, is formulated analytically at the elemental level. Numerical results show that the non-linearity of the problem, which is effectively determined by the quality of the a priori information, plays an important role in the performance of the method. With a sufficient number of reasonably well distributed data, the parameters can be well resolved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it