MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532944097 · doi:10.1029/164gm13

Reading the geochemical fingerprints of archean hot subduction volcanic rocks: Evidence for accretion and crustal recycling in a mobile tectonic regime

2006· book-chapter· en· W1532944097 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Polat, R. Kerrich

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcheanSubductionGeologyGeodynamicsGeochemistryAccretion (finance)TectonicsVolcanoVolcanic arcVolcanic rockEarth sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Cenozoic Island Arc Volcanic Rocks Associated with “Hot Subduction” Archean “Hot Subduction” Rocks Geochemical Evidence for Crustal Recycling in Archean Subduction Zones Archean Geodynamics: Autochthonous Versus Allochthonous Growth Conclusions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical monographSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207