MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532997732 · doi:10.1029/2010gl043965

Geodynamic models of Archean continental collision and the formation of mantle lithosphere keels

2010· article· en· W1532997732 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Gray, R. N. Pysklywec

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImbricationGeologyUnderplatingLithosphereMantle (geology)CrustCratonTransition zoneContinental crustArcheanCollision zonePetrologyCrustal recyclingGeophysicsMantle convectionGeochemistrySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The processes responsible for the formation of thick, strong and cold Archean sub‐continental lithospheric mantle (mantle keels) beneath Archean cratons remain elusive. Here, the dynamics of some such processes are studied by forward numerical modeling of the thermo‐mechanical evolution of continental lithosphere undergoing collision and orogenesis under Neoarchean‐like conditions. The numerical experiments illustrate that depending on the composition of the crust and the degree of radioactive heat production (RHP) in the crust, three dominant modes of mantle lithosphere deformation evolve: (1) pure‐shear thickening; (2) imbrication; (3) and a mode best described as underplating. All three modes of deformation result in the thickening and emplacement of plate‐like mantle lithosphere to depths between 200 km and 350 km. The transition from pure‐shear thickening to imbrication is largely dependent on the degree of RHP in the crust, while the transition from the imbrication style to the underplating style is dependent on the composition of the lower crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207