Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pendant 6 mois entre l’été 2011 et l’hiver 2012, un large mouvement de contestation populaire israélien a pris corps dans les villes, bénéficiant de relais dans l’opinion publique et l’espace médiatique et a ébranlé la vie politique israélienne. Le soulèvement intervenu dans le contexte des « printemps des peuples » qui se prolonge aujourd’hui par des actions collectives plus ou moins robustes (campements, tribunal populaire, assemblée du peuple) doit pouvoir être lu à partir de visées sociologiques et politiques renvoyant à la question économique sociale et culturelle en Israël. Celle-ci est en tout état de cause le reflet du recul de l’État social qui était au cœur du projet sioniste. Dans cet article, l’auteure porte l’attention sur cette question de deux ordres : l’analyse des justifications critiques qui ont pu permettre, le temps d’une révolte de dénoncer la réalité et la façon dont les controverses (notamment dans le domaine du logement) sont portées en public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".