The Geology of Parliament Buildings 2. The Geology of the Alberta Legislative Building
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alberta's Legislative Building was constructed in Beaux Arts style on the crest of the north bank of the North Saskatchewan River in Edmonton. Excavation for the foundations began in1907; the interior marble and plaster work was completed by 1913. The exterior walls of the basement and first storey were built with grey granodiorite quarried from islands in the mouth of Jervis Inlet, British Columbia. The upper stories consist of Paleocene sandstone from the Bow River valley of southern Alberta. The splendid Corinthian pillars of the main portico required Ohio sandstone to support the Provincial Coat of Arms on the pediment. Marbles from Phillipsburg, Quebec panel the walls of the Rotunda and form the Grand Staircase up to the Legislative Assembly. The Chamber is decorated with spectacular green serpentine marble from Pennsylvania. Resume L'edifice de la legislature de l'Alberta de style Beaux-arts, a ete construit sur le promontoire de la rive nord de la riviere Saskatchewan nord a Edmonton. L'excavation du site a debute en 1907 et les travaux de plâtrage se sont termine en 1913. Le revetement des murs du sous-sol et du rez-de-chaussee provient d'une granodiorite grise extraite d'une carriere d'une ile de l'anse Jervis en Colombie-Britannique. Le revetement des etages superieurs provient d'un gres paleocene de la vallee de la riviere Bow dans le sud de A Alberta. Les magnifiques piliers corinthiens du portique principal en gres de l'Ohio soutiennent les armoiries de la province en marbre du fronton. Des plaques de marbre de Phillipsburg au Quebec lambrissent les murs de la rotonde et forment le grand escalier menant a l'enceinte de l'Assemblee legislative. L'enceinte de l'Assemblee legislative est decoree d'un magnifique marbre serpentinise de Pennsylvanie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".