MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Separate and Unequal: The Consumption of Public Education in Post‐Katrina New Orleans

2011· article· en· W1533693576 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Akers

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetropolitan areaPoliticsHurricane katrinaVoucherState (computer science)Public administrationPolitical scienceHappeningPublic educationSociologyNatural disasterGeographyEconomicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Before the floodwaters of Hurricane Katrina had receded, New Orleans was inundated by a wave of neoliberal prescriptions, foundation money and celebrity educators eager to dismantle the city's public education system. The opening of public education to the market has left the residents of New Orleans with an education system that is increasingly separate and unequal. At the center of this radical neoliberal experiment is a 40‐year effort by local proponents of ‘school choice’ for a voucher program. This research examines the links between the system of forces — economic, social, political and (in the case of Katrina) natural — and the transformation of daily life within the city and metropolitan area through policy and media discourse. This article argues that prior efforts to undermine public education at the state and municipal level were key to the velocity and scope of the subsequent changes in New Orleans. Efforts to organize against these changes have focused on the role of think‐tanks and foundations at the national scale. This focus severely limits the power of local organizations to challenge those driving these changes within their communities. Résumé L'inondation causée par l'ouragan Katrina ne s'était pas résorbée que la Nouvelle‐Orléans croulait sous une vague de propositions néolibérales, de fonds caritatifs et d'éducateurs médiatiques impatients de démanteler l'enseignement public de la ville. À la suite de l'ouverture du marché, les habitants se sont retrouvés avec un système éducatif toujours plus séparé et inégal. Cette expérience néolibérale extrême est le fruit d'une entreprise menée sur quarante ans par des partisans locaux du ‘libre‐choix scolaire’ en faveur d'un régime de chèques‐études. Sont examinés ici les rapports entre le système des forces en présence —économiques, sociales, politiques et (dans le cas de Katrina) naturelles — et la transformation de la vie quotidienne, dans la ville et la zone métropolitaine, à travers l'action publique et le discours des médias. Les attaques précédentes contre l'éducation publique au niveau de l'État et de la municipalité ont franchement favorisé la rapidité et l'ampleur des changements qu'a connus ensuite la Nouvelle‐Orléans. Les tentatives d'organisation contre cette évolution se sont concentrées sur l'importance des groupes de réflexion et des fondations caritatives au niveau national. Cet intérêt restreint sérieusement le potentiel nécessaire aux associations ou organismes locaux pour contrer ceux qui mènent ces transformations au sein de leurs communautés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.413
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207