Cambiar la tabla de operación. El <i>medium</i> intermedial
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo gira en torno a la idea de que estamos experimentando una profunda crisis en nuestra (moderna) literacy y, sugiere, que la noción de intermedialidad podría ayudar a comprender la nueva literacy que se desarrolla al margen del logocentrismo. Contra toda una tradición filosófica que primero trata de comprender y nombrar a las sustancias, y luego, captar sus relaciones, la intermedialidad se enfoca en las relaciones y entiende las sustancias como puntos relacionales que demandan (y permiten) un profundo cambio en la manera como pensamos y operamos. Para estudiar tal crisis y los cambios involucrados, la autora cuestiona el paradigma intermedial como ha sido teorizado por el discurso académico contemporáneo; discute los conceptos de medium y mediación, corazón del concepto de intermedialidad, y trata de sugerir vías para la comprensión del contexto intermedial en el cual pensamos y actuamos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it