MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1533873536 · doi:10.5772/36817

New Approaches to Designing Genes by Evolution in the Computer

2012· book-chapter· en· W1533873536 on OpenAlexaff
V Vlassov Alexander, Muniswamy David

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyEvolutionary biologyTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of Evolutionary Computation (EC) has been inspired by ideas from the classical theory of biological evolution, with, in particular, the components of a population from which reproductive parents are chosen, a reproductive protocol, a method for altering the genetic information of offspring, and a means for testing the fitness of offspring in order to include them in the population.In turn, impressive progress in EC -understanding the reasons for efficiencies in evolutionary searches -has begun to influence scientific work in the field of molecular evolution and in the modeling of biological evolution (Stemmer, 1994a,b;van Nimwegen et al. 1997; 1999; Crutchfield & van Nimwegen, 2001).In this chapter, we will discuss how developments in EC, particularly in the area of crossover operators for Genetic Algorithms (GA), provide new understanding of evolutionary search efficiencies, and the impacts this can have for biological molecular evolution, including directed evolution in the test tube.GA approaches have five particular elements: encoding (the 'chromosome'); a population; a method for selecting parents and making a child chromosome from the parents' chromosomes; a method for altering the child's chromosomes (mutation and crossover/recombination); criteria for fitness; and rules, based on fitness, by which offspring are included into the population (and parents retained).We will discuss our work and others' on each of these aspects, but our focus is on the substantial efficiencies that can be found in the alteration of the child chromosome step.For this, we take inspiration from real biological reproduction mechanisms. Biological evolution by random point mutations?Traditional GA, using random point mutations, indicates that such a mechanism would be too slow to account for the observed speed of biological evolution (e.g.Shapiro, 2010).This suggests that other more complicated mutational mechanisms are acting (Shapiro, 1999, www.intechopen.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207