Decreased progression to rheumatoid arthritis or other connective tissue diseases in patients with palindromic rheumatism treated with antimalarials.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of antimalarials is associated with a reduction in the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or other connective tissue diseases in patients with palindromic rheumatism. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on a review of medical records to evaluate the outcome of patients with palindromic rheumatism referred to an academic center from 1986 to 1996: 113 patients complied with the selection criteria, including diagnostic criteria for palindromic rheumatism and onset of disease since 1980. After adjusting for potential confounders, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used to estimate the risk of developing RA or other connective tissue disease in patients who had received antimalarials compared to those who had not. RESULTS: Age of disease onset was 40+/-12 yrs, and mean disease duration 4.8+/-4 yrs; two-thirds of the patients were female. Sixty-two (55%) patients received antimalarials, for a mean duration of therapy of 28 mo. Thirty-three (29%) patients developed RA, 3 developed systemic lupus, and 4 developed other connective tissue diseases. Twenty (32%) patients in the antimalarial group developed a secondary disease, compared to 20 (39%) who did not receive therapy. Statistically significant differences were observed comparing time to event in both groups. The estimated median time to development of a chronic disease was 162 months in treated and 56 months in untreated patients. After adjusting for other variables in the Cox regression models, significant risk reduction in the development of a secondary disease was observed for antimalarial use (hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.61). For RA, the risk reduction was 0.19 (95% CI 0.07-0.57). We conducted a sensitivity analysis around our censoring estimates. The risk reduction remained statistically significant, with 0.36 for RA and 0.41 for RA or other connective tissue disease. CONCLUSION: Use of antimalarials in patients with palindromic rheumatism is associated with a reduction in the risk of developing subsequent RA or other connective tissue disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".