MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Upstream activators of PGC‐1α transcription with acute contractile activity (1164.4)

2014· article· en· W1534054673 on OpenAlexafffund
Heather Carter, Michael Shuen, David A. Hood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTranscription (linguistics)Transcription factorPromoterMessenger RNACoactivatorMolecular biologyChemistryLuciferaseBiologyCell biologyGeneGene expressionTransfectionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PGC‐1α is a potent transcriptional coactivator of numerous genes involved in contractile activity‐induced mitochondrial biogenesis. We sought to describe the role of transcription factors that regulate the PGC‐1α promoter in the context of acute contractile activity along with established downstream targets. A 1.5kb upstream region of the PGC‐1α promoter fused to a luciferase reporter was injected and electroporated into the rat tibialis anterior (TA) muscle bilaterally. Five days after injection the left TA was subjected to in situ contractile activity for 15 mins (5 mins at 1 Hz, 10 mins at 10Hz) while the right TA served as a resting control. Animals were allowed to recover for 2 hours, and then tissues were extracted. During stimulation, muscle force declined to 40% of initial tension. Transcriptional activity of the PGC‐1α promoter was elevated 3.6‐fold in the stimulated TA, while PGC‐1α mRNA was increased by 1.4‐fold. COX IV and NRF‐1, transcriptional targets of PGC‐1α, were each elevated by 1.2‐fold. NF‐E2 related factor 2 (Nrf2), a transcription factor with a putative binding site on the PGC‐1α promoter was increased by 1.4‐fold at the mRNA level, while GATA4, previously identified as a transcriptional regulator of PGC‐1α, remained unchanged. Thus, contractile activity signals lead to large increases in PGC‐1α transcription along with smaller increments in upstream activators, and downstream targets. Grant Funding Source : Supported By NSERC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→