MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534099218

IVNI ALEXI y M NOV IVST: dos lucernas con firma halladas en Carthago Nova

2006· article· es· W1534099218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandro Quevedo

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova (rocket)Context (archaeology)ChronologyNova scotiaGeologyGeographyArchaeologyEngineeringAeronautics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following research is based on the analysis of two fragments of African lamps which were found during the excavation works in the curia of Carthago Nova (Cartagena, Spain). Both feature the manufacturer’s signature and its partial preservation has not hindered the identification of his full name: IVNI ALEXI and M NOV IVST. Its discovery within a sealed up stratigraphical context allows us to set out a new proposal about its chronology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.109 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Same topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207