MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534200679 · doi:10.1109/memea.2015.7145194

Integration of outcome estimations with a clinical decision support system: Application in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)

2015· article· en· W1534200679 on OpenAlexaff
Monique Frize, Jeff Gilchrist, Hasmik Martirosyan, Erika Bariciak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeonatal intensive care unitDecision support systemComputer scienceIntensive careOutcome (game theory)Risk analysis (engineering)MedicineArtificial intelligenceIntensive care medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our previous research led to the development of mortality risk estimations for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using quality archived databases. A decision support system was created with a clinician module containing relevant patient information and a variety of outcome estimations; the PPADS (Physician-Parent Decision Support) tool also contains a module for parents with the aim to help them make joint decisions with physicians on the direction of care for their infant. New work developed the ANN-Builder which uses an open-source artificial neural network library that would enable handling real-time data streaming and automate the process of providing risk estimations of mortality. Additionally, the patient data and risk estimations were successfully integrated into the PPADS tool. The mortality estimations surpass the clinical expectations. The next and final step will be to replace missing values in the data and add alarms for major changes in the risk estimations provided by the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.361
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207