Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent development of nonlinear time series analysis is primarily due to the efforts to overcome the limitations of linear models such as autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models of Box and Jenkins (1976) in real applications. Two examples of such limitations are the non-ability to model sudden outbursts and the restriction to symmetry in the sense of reversible processes, whereas many processes observed in reality reveal irreversibility, well-known examples being the sunspot numbers and the Canadian Lynx data, see Tong (1990) for a discussion of these data sets with respect to nonlinearity and irreversibility. The increasing popularity of nonlinear time series models is also attributed to the development of nonlinear and nonparametric regression techniques which provides many useful tools. Advanced computational power and easy-to-use advanced softwares and graphics such as S-Plus(Venables and Ripley (1994)) and XploRe(Hardle, Klinke and Turlach (1995)) contribute to the increasing application of nonlinear time series analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it