MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534697340

Aanbevolen Deense herkomsten van sitkaspar in Nederland

2004· article· nl· W1534697340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-Environmental Systems Modeling · 2004
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceTheologyArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resultaten van een langlopend onderzoek naar de beste herkomsten van Sitkaspar voor Nederland. Sitkaspar komt van nature voor in een smalle zone langs de westkust van de VS en Canada. In Nederland is de soort op kleine schaal aangeplant, en in geval van verjonging is het van belang materiaal te gebruiken dat zo goed mogelijk is aangepast aan de Nederlandse ecologische omstandigheden. In het herkomstonderzoek zijn herkomsten uit Noord-Amerika en Denemarken vergeleken op eigenschappen als groei, stamvorm, laat uitlopen en slagingspercentage. Vier Deense herkomsten (uit drie zaadopstanden en een zaadgaard) worden vanwege hun kwaliteit opgenomen in de aanbevelende Rassenlijst voor Bomen. Alterra-rapport 846: Internationaal herkomstonderzoek Sitkaspar in Nederland, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it