La validation du récit par la poétique de la parole dans le théâtre de Daniel Danis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, l’auteur cherche à cerner en quoi l’accumulation d’épisodes, souvent violents, dans le théâtre de Danis se trouve à prendre le contrepied des usages dominants des « raconteurs d’histoires » dans l’espace public contemporain. Raconter ne suffit pas, encore faut-il savoir jouer des modalités énonciatives que l’acte de parler libère chez le locuteur danisien. Cette poétique de la parole est certes marquée par le Gestus de la comparution, du témoignage d’après les faits — temporalité dans l’après-coup et responsabilité de dire le vrai —, mais aussi par la vivacité émotionnelle de la mise en confidence et du commentaire, à même un dispositif apte à faire du spectateur un partenaire du choeur des parleurs. Là est l’originalité de cette choralité à la fois intime et publique, objectivante et parfaitement subjective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".