MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W153480195 · doi:10.7202/032834ar

Last Interglacial Muir Point Formation, Vancouver Island, British Columbia

2007· article· en· W153480195 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Stephen R. Hicock

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyInterglacialPalynologyPleistocenePaleontologyFluvialLithologySubaerialPollenEemianOceanographyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Muir Point Formation probably represents the last interglacial and climatic maximum of the Late Pleistocene in southwest British Columbia. It comprises estuarine, floodplain, fluvial, alluvial fan, and debris flow lithofacies. The lower exposed part of the formation is normally magnetized and probably formed during the Brunhes Normal Polarity Chron (<790 ka BP). On the basis of similar polarity, palynology, lithologies, and stratigraphic position, the Muir Point Formation is correlated with the Whidbey Formation of northwest Washington State. It probably also correlates with the Highbury Formation under the Fraser Lowland of mainland British Columbia.These formations may be remnants of shallow marine or subaerial sediment shelves which once rimmed ancestral Strait of Georgia and Puget basins over 100 ka, but were mostly removed by later glaciations. During this time sea level may have been 10 m higher than today. The middle floodplain unit contains five pollen zones whose differences can be explained mainly by shifts in a meandering tidal stream. Throughout most of this record Douglas fir pollen is more abundant than in modern pollen rain around the study sites which indicates that paleoclimate was at least as warm and dry as present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207