MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1534809093 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2001.1008678

Real-time PET image reconstruction based on regularized pseudo-inverse of the system matrix

2005· article· en· W1534809093 on OpenAlexaff
Vitali Selivanov, Martin Lepage, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

Venue2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingular value decompositionIterative reconstructionAlgorithmPixelRegularization (linguistics)Truncation (statistics)Inverse problemComputer scienceSingular valueImage resolutionMathematicsComputer visionProjection (relational algebra)Matrix (chemical analysis)InverseArtificial intelligenceEigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The feasibility of tomographic image reconstruction by projection data filtering based on the singular value decomposition of the system matrix has recently been demonstrated in high-resolution animal positron emission tomography (PET). A regularization methodology involving truncation of the singular value spectrum based on the systematic spatial resolution analysis has been proposed and successfully applied. In the present paper, we show how realtime image reconstruction can be achieved using the regularized pseudo-inverse of the system matrix. An update of the current image estimate can be obtained using one column of the regularized pseudo-inverse matrix to account for the next registered event, thus allowing, in principle, for instant visualization of the radioactivity distribution while the object is still being scanned. Computed estimates converge to the minimum-norm least-squares solution of the regularized inverse problem when sufficient total counts are acquired to fulfill the assumption of the normal data error distribution. The computing expenses for image updating to account for the next registered event depend only on the total number of pixels in the discrete image representation. Data storage requirements are discussed. Limited angle tomography and non-traditional detection geometry may be handled using the described image reconstruction approach as well. The proposed method was tested with the list-mode PET data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinglow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designSimulation or modeling · Bench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods · Empirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207