Ecological characteristics and ratings for soils of Arctic Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents results from the terrestrial research group from the Swedish-Canadian expedition "Tundra Northwest 1999" (TNW99). Sites were chosen with respect to the ecological states mesic and dry. Soils show a great variability with regard to local aspects. Elevated contents of organic matter (>2% TOC) are abundant, especially at mesic sites with full vegetation cover. C/N-values lower than 14 correspond with a dominance of annual plant species. Strong differences in the contents of oxalate extractable iron are observed. Most soils have low salt contents and react alkaline due to higher contents of carbonates with respect to their parent material. Soils are strongly influenced by climate conditions, some of them are enriched with salts, due to an influence of the sea shore in the neighbourhood. Surface layers show high amounts of bacteria, extremes are above 10^9 cells g^(-1). All communities show mostly small sized organisms, and reveal low values of mean cell volumes and surfaces, and thus low biomass. The most important group of bacterial cells can be seen in small rod shaped cells (0.25-0.75μm). A concept of ecological ratings is used to describe the regional and local differences. The TNW99 sites are compared to those from other locations from Arctic Canada taken from literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it