Dendritic Cells Pulsed with Live and Dead <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> Elicit Distinct Immune Responses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legionella pneumophila is the causative pathogen of Legionnaires' disease, which is characterized by severe pneumonia. In regard to the pathophysiology of Legionella infection, the role of inflammatory phagocytes such as macrophages has been well documented, but the involvement of dendritic cells (DCs) has not been clarified. In this study, we have investigated the immune responses that DCs generate in vitro and in vivo after contact with L. pneumophila. Heat- and formalin-killed L. pneumophila, but not live L. pneumophila, induced immature DCs to undergo similar phenotypic maturation, but the secreted proinflammatory cytokines showed different patterns. The mechanisms of the DC maturation by heat- or formalin-killed L. pneumophila depended, at least in part, on Toll-like receptor 4 signaling or on Legionella LPS, respectively. After transfer to naive mice, DCs pulsed with dead Legionella produced serum Ig isotype responses specific for Legionella, leading to protective immunity against an otherwise lethal respiratory challenge with L. pneumophila. The in vivo immune responses required the Ag presentation of DCs, especially that on MHC class II molecules, and the immunity yielded cross-protection between clinical and environmental strains of L. pneumophila. Although the DC maturation was impaired by live Legionella, macrophages were activated by live as well as dead L. pneumophila, as evidenced by the up-regulation of MHC class II. Finally, DCs, but not macrophages, exhibited a proliferative response to live L. pneumophila that was consistent with their cell cycle progression. These findings provide a better understanding of the role of DCs in adaptive immunity to Legionella infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".