MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W153509639

Advertising and Childhood Obesity: The Role of the Federal Government in Limiting Children's Exposure to Unhealthy Food Advertisements

2014· article· en· W153509639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Milena Mikailova

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal communications law journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildhood obesityAdvertisingGovernment (linguistics)ObesityUnhealthy foodLimitingCommercial speechMedicineFood marketingEnvironmental healthBusinessOverweightPolitical scienceLawEngineeringSupreme courtFirst amendment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table of Contents I. Introduction II. the Role of the Federal Government in Curbing Childhood Obesity III. The Inadequacy of Self-Regulation IV. International Perspectives A. Overview of Efforts to Limit Unhealthy Food Advertisements in Europe B. A Closer Look: The United Kingdom and Quebec 1. United Kingdom 2. Quebec V. The Children's Television Act VI. Proposed Solution VII. The First Amendment and Regulations Limiting Commercial Speech as They Relate to Restrictions on Advertising A. The Applicable Standard B. Regulation of Unhealthy Advertisements Directed at Children as a Valid Restriction on Commercial Speech 1. Constitutionally Protected Speech and Substantial Government Interest 2. Regulation Directly Advances the Government Interest 3. Narrowly Tailored Standard VIII. Conclusion I. INTRODUCTION Children are inundated with advertising for foods of poor nutritional quality, watching approximately 4,000 food-related advertisements per year in the United States, ninety-eight percent of which feature products that are high in fat, sugar, or sodium. (1) Exposure to such advertisements has been shown to influence the food preferences, purchase requests, and dietary intake of children aged two to eleven. (2) One in seven children between the ages of two and eleven are currently obese. (3) Obese children are more likely to develop serious health conditions, such as high blood pressure, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. (4) With hospitalizations of children for obesity-related illnesses on the rise, the annual direct cost of childhood obesity is reaching nearly $14.3 billion. (5) Despite these statistics, television advertisements for unhealthy foods continue to be aired during children's programming. The federal government has recognized that childhood obesity is a problem that must be addressed. Although the Joint Task Force on Media and Childhood Obesity and the Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children were launched with good intentions, they have not helped to reverse the trend in childhood obesity. (6) Furthermore, industry self-regulation has been ineffective at adequately reducing the number of television advertisements featuring nutritionally poor foods. (7) Children continue to be exposed to a large volume of commercials that advertise products containing high amounts of saturated fat, sugar, and sodium. (8) The federal government must reevaluate its efforts to decrease the prevalence of childhood obesity. Congress should provide explicit direction to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to restrict the advertisement of unhealthy foods during children's programming, defined in the regulations issued by the FCC pursuant to the Children's Television Act of 1990 (CTA) (9) as programs originally produced and broadcast primarily for an audience of children 12 years old and younger. (10) Further, Congress should delegate to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the task of determining and adopting nutritional standards identifying which foods are unhealthy for consumption by children in this age group. Part II of this Note examines the various initiatives that have been launched by the federal government in an effort to combat childhood obesity. Although the government has attempted to play a role in reducing the prevalence of childhood obesity, it must become more involved in order to make any significant progress. Part III of this Note then discusses the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, an attempt at industry-self regulation that has failed to considerably reduce children's exposure to unhealthy food advertisements. Part IV of this Note surveys the measures taken by numerous European countries to reduce children's exposure to televised advertisements of unhealthy food and then provides a closer examination of the efforts made by the governments of the United Kingdom and Quebec, Canada, to achieve this goal. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal communications law journalSame topicLegal Issues in EducationFrench-language works237,207