MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1535194096

A Deterministic Bases Piecewise Wind Power Forecasting Models

2014· article· en· W1535194096 on OpenAlexaffabout
G.A.N. Mbamalu, Alex Harding

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyWind powerWind speedTurbinePiecewiseWind power forecastingPiecewise linear functionEstimatorPower (physics)Computer scienceEconometricsMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMathematical optimizationSimulationEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Electric power systemMathematicsStatisticsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continue emphasis in mitigating the environmental impacts of fossil generated electrical energy has fuelled interest in sustainable and renewable energy; as a result of this interest, renewable energy penetration into power utilities energy mix has increased significantly. Two major issues delaying further increase of renewable energy are supply intermittency and availability. Prediction of renewable energy availability can never be over emphasized. In this paper we propose a simple nonlinear least square piecewise model to predict output power of a small Canadian wind farm. The proposed model decomposes the wind speed sweeping the wind turbine into three major speed groups, slow, moderate and fast speed. The dynamics of the wind speed in each group defines the model and the prediction error performance. We showed that the piecewise model outperformed the manufacturer’s power curve that is traditionally uses by wind farms. We present typical predictions for Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer and compared results from our proposed model to the manufacturer’s power curve. The piecewise model as well as the manufacturer’s power curve performances are both related to the skill of the wind speed estimator, accurate wind speed estimates will result to excellent forecast for both models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207