Birth and life of auroral arcs embedded in the evening auroral oval convection: A critical comparison of observations with theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present and analyze data on auroral arcs obtained during a pass of the FAST satellite over the field‐of‐view of the all‐sky camera at Ft. Simpson (Canada), supported by ground‐based magnetometer and SuperDARN radar data, and plasma data from THEMIS‐A near the source region of the auroral currents. The auroral event took place at 19:00 MLT during substorm activity further east. Active auroral arcs were present over six degrees in latitude moving equatorward with significant changes in brightness and structure. New arcs were forming continuously at the polar border of the auroral oval which was marked by an Alfvénic arc. The data analysis revealed that the equatorward drift of the arcs was in part due to convective motion of the plasma frame but was rather dominated by proper motions of the arcs. Interpretation of these findings in the framework of theoretical work by one of the authors reproduces quantitatively the observed proper motion as a consequence of the progressive erosion of magnetic shear stresses. Most important was the possibility to deduce the interaction time scale between arc and source region. On average it corresponded to about six to eight transit times of an Alfvén wave between arc and source plasma or two fundamental eigenperiods of toroidal mode or azimuthally polarized Alfvén waves. However, large variations of the interaction times and corresponding proper motions were found. They are attributed to temporal and spatial variations of the energy input from the source plasma. The more remarkable is the fact that analysis on the basis of a quasi‐stationary model produces consistent results. The progressive release of shear stresses during the equatorward motion of the arcs leads to the conclusion that they are dying after having reached the maximum of the poleward Pedersen current.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".