Maternal Nutrition and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Lessons from Epidemiology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The term ‘Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia’ (MEN) denotes a genetically determined syndrome characterized by the independent appearance of benign or malignant changes of several endocrine organs as well as occasional changes of neural, muscular and connective tissue. Three different forms have been identified: MEN 1 (Wermer’s syndrome) includes parathyroid hyperplasia in combination with pancreatic islet cell and pituitary tumours; MEN 2a (Sipple’s syndrome) includes medullary thyroid carcinoma in association with phaeochromocytoma and parathyroid hyperplasia; MEN 2b includes medullary thyroid carcinoma, phaeochromocytoma and mucosal neuromas. MEN syndrome is transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait with a high degree of penetrance. The changes in the individual glands appear to be causally and temporally independent of each other. A spectrum of pathological changes exist in the affected glands which range from hyperplasia to adenoma to carcinoma. The pathological process is almost always multicentric, often resulting in bilateral disease of organs. The appearance of an endocrine tumour known to be associated with MEN should alert the physician to the possibility of a MEN syndrome. When the possibility of such a syndrome exists, screening and long-term observation should be initiated to diagnose a carcinoma in its earliest stage, or before the development of clinical manifestations of hormone excess.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".